The Resource Peer evaluation and self assessment : a comparative study of the effectiveness of two complex methods of writing instruction in six sections of composition, by Kristen J. Nielsen

Peer evaluation and self assessment : a comparative study of the effectiveness of two complex methods of writing instruction in six sections of composition, by Kristen J. Nielsen

Label
Peer evaluation and self assessment : a comparative study of the effectiveness of two complex methods of writing instruction in six sections of composition
Title
Peer evaluation and self assessment
Title remainder
a comparative study of the effectiveness of two complex methods of writing instruction in six sections of composition
Statement of responsibility
by Kristen J. Nielsen
Creator
Subject
Genre
Language
eng
Summary
Abstract: Over recent decades, the teaching of writing has evolved to incorporate a wide range of methods. Little is known, however, about the effect of many of these methods on student writing outcomes. Much of the literature offers description of teachers' classroom practices rather than study of effectiveness, highlighting a significant research gap. This process-outcome study begins to fill the gap in writing research by analyzing and evaluating two key methods in writing instruction using quasi-experimental methods. This study first defines and describes the numerous practices common to peer evaluation and self assessment and their theoretical framework, and, through an analysis of the literature, stabilizes the practices found to be most effective by instructors of writing, and supports these methods with a list of strategies for implementation. The effects of peer evaluation and self assessment on student writing were then measured. Each practice was assigned to two sections of first-year college writing. The differences between pre and post writing test scores from peer- and self-assessment sections were then compared against control sections. Findings were significant. Peer evaluation yielded mixed results: with a positive effect for low-ability writers, no difference from the control for middle ability, and a negative effect for high-ability writers. In contrast, self assessment was found to be more effective than the control for all levels of writers and more effective than peer evaluation for most writers, with a matching benefit for low-ability writers. These results indicate that all learners can benefit from self-assessment methods in writing, but that peer evaluation's impact is positive for more limited numbers of students and may have little or no benefit for others. The literature review and discussion of qualitative findings from this study also explore complexities of teaching with each method and strategies to support success, with particular focus on the impact of student motivation challenges on writing achievement
Cataloging source
BOS
http://library.link/vocab/creatorName
Nielsen, Kristen J
Dissertation note
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Boston University, 2012.
Index
no index present
Literary form
non fiction
Nature of contents
  • dictionaries
  • theses
http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
Boston University
Label
Peer evaluation and self assessment : a comparative study of the effectiveness of two complex methods of writing instruction in six sections of composition, by Kristen J. Nielsen
Instantiates
Publication
Note
Vita
Bibliography note
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 127-141)
Dimensions
28 cm.
Dimensions
unknown
Extent
xiii, 146 leaves
Form of item
electronic
Governing access note
Abstract and full text (PDF format) available online through IP addresses on the Boston University campus; proxy access also available
Specific material designation
remote
System control number
  • (OCoLC)812452669
  • (OCoLC)ocn812452669
Label
Peer evaluation and self assessment : a comparative study of the effectiveness of two complex methods of writing instruction in six sections of composition, by Kristen J. Nielsen
Publication
Note
Vita
Bibliography note
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 127-141)
Dimensions
28 cm.
Dimensions
unknown
Extent
xiii, 146 leaves
Form of item
electronic
Governing access note
Abstract and full text (PDF format) available online through IP addresses on the Boston University campus; proxy access also available
Specific material designation
remote
System control number
  • (OCoLC)812452669
  • (OCoLC)ocn812452669

Library Locations

  • African Studies LibraryBorrow it
    771 Commonwealth Avenue, 6th Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.350723 -71.108227
  • Alumni Medical LibraryBorrow it
    72 East Concord Street, Boston, MA, 02118, US
    42.336388 -71.072393
  • Astronomy LibraryBorrow it
    725 Commonwealth Avenue, 6th Floor, Boston, MA, 02445, US
    42.350259 -71.105717
  • Fineman and Pappas Law LibrariesBorrow it
    765 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.350979 -71.107023
  • Frederick S. Pardee Management LibraryBorrow it
    595 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.349626 -71.099547
  • Howard Gotlieb Archival Research CenterBorrow it
    771 Commonwealth Avenue, 5th Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.350723 -71.108227
  • Mugar Memorial LibraryBorrow it
    771 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.350723 -71.108227
  • Music LibraryBorrow it
    771 Commonwealth Avenue, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.350723 -71.108227
  • Pikering Educational Resources LibraryBorrow it
    2 Silber Way, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.349804 -71.101425
  • School of Theology LibraryBorrow it
    745 Commonwealth Avenue, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.350494 -71.107235
  • Science & Engineering LibraryBorrow it
    38 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.348472 -71.102257
  • Stone Science LibraryBorrow it
    675 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02445, US
    42.350103 -71.103784
Processing Feedback ...