The Resource Screening for visual impairment in children ages 1-5 years : systematic review to update the 2004 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation, prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; prepared by: Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University ; investigators: Roger Chou, Tracy Dana, Christina Bougatsos, (electronic resource)

Screening for visual impairment in children ages 1-5 years : systematic review to update the 2004 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation, prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; prepared by: Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University ; investigators: Roger Chou, Tracy Dana, Christina Bougatsos, (electronic resource)

Label
Screening for visual impairment in children ages 1-5 years : systematic review to update the 2004 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation
Title
Screening for visual impairment in children ages 1-5 years
Title remainder
systematic review to update the 2004 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation
Statement of responsibility
prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; prepared by: Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University ; investigators: Roger Chou, Tracy Dana, Christina Bougatsos
Creator
Contributor
Subject
Language
  • eng
  • eng
Summary
BACKGROUND: Impaired visual acuity is common in preschool-aged children. Screening for impaired visual acuity in primary care settings could identify children with vision problems at a critical period of visual development and lead to interventions to improve vision, function, and quality of life. PURPOSE: To assess the effects of screening for impaired visual acuity in primary care settings in preschool-aged (1 to 5 years) children. DATA SOURCES: We searched Ovid MEDLINE from 1950 to July 2009, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews through the third quarter of 2009. We supplemented electronic searches with reviews of reference lists of relevant articles and solicited additional citations from experts. STUDY SELECTION: We selected randomized trials and controlled observational studies that directly evaluated screening for impaired visual acuity in preschool-aged children. To evaluate indirect evidence on screening, we also included studies on the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests for impaired visual acuity used in primary care settings, and randomized trials and controlled observational studies that reported clinical outcomes associated with treatments for impaired visual acuity due to refractive error, amblyopia, or amblyogenic risk factors (visual acuity, quality of life, functional capacity [including school performance], or adverse events). DATA EXTRACTION: One investigator abstracted data and a second investigator checked data abstraction for accuracy. Two investigators independently assessed study quality using methods developed by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. DATA SYNTHESIS: No randomized trial evaluated outcomes of preschool vision screening compared with no screening. One large, fair-quality randomized trial nested within a population-based cohort study found that repeat orthoptist screening from ages 8 to 37 months was associated with reduced likelihood of amblyopia at age 7.5 years compared with one-time orthoptist screening at age 37 months on one of two definitions of amblyopia. A large, prospective cohort study from this population found that one-time orthoptist screening at age 37 months was associated with no significant difference in risk for amblyopia at age 7.5 years compared with no screening. No study evaluated school performance or other functional outcomes. No screening test was consistently associated with both high (>90 percent) sensitivity and specificity. In the largest study to directly compare the diagnostic accuracy of different screening tests, differences in likelihood ratio estimates and diagnostic odds ratios for 10 different screening tests were generally small, with the exception of the Random Dot E stereoacuity test, which was associated with a lower diagnostic odds ratio. Diagnostic accuracy of preschool vision tests did not clearly differ in children stratified by age, though testability was generally lower in children ages 1 to 3 years, with the potential exception of the MTI photoscreener. Three fair- or good-quality trials of preschool-aged children with amblyopia or unilateral refractive error found that treatment (patching and/or eyeglasses) resulted in small (<1 line on the Snellen eye chart) improvements in visual acuity in the amblyopic or worse eye compared with no treatment after 5 weeks to 1 year of follow-up. One trial found larger benefits in the subgroup of children with worse baseline visual impairment. No trial evaluated effects of treatment on school performance or other measures of function. Evidence on whether age has an impact on effectiveness of treatment is mixed. Amblyopia treatments were associated with reversible visual acuity loss in the nonamblyogenic eye in some studies. Evidence on adverse psychosocial effects and effects of suboptimal compliance with amblyopia treatments is limited. LIMITATIONS: We excluded nonEnglish-language studies, could not evaluate for publication bias because of the small numbers of trials, included studies of screening in community-based settings, and did not construct outcomes tables. CONCLUSIONS: Direct evidence on effectiveness of preschool vision screening for improving visual acuity or other clinical outcomes remains limited and does not adequately address whether screening is more effective than no screening. In terms of indirect evidence, a number of screening tests appear to have utility for identification of preschool-aged children with vision problems, and treatments for amblyopia or unilateral refractive error (with or without amblyopia) are associated with mild improvements in visual acuity compared with no treatment. Additional studies are needed to better understand effects of screening compared with no screening, to clarify the risk for potential unintended harms from screening (such as use of unnecessary treatments), and to define the optimal time at which to initiate screening during the preschool years
Member of
Cataloging source
DNLM
http://library.link/vocab/creatorName
Chou, Roger
Funding information
Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services1, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850, www.ahrq.gov Contract Number: HHSA-290-2007-10057-I-EPC3, Task Order No. 3 Prepared by: Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University2, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code BICC, Portland, OR 97239, www.ohsu.edu/epc
Government publication
federal national government publication
Index
no index present
Literary form
non fiction
Nature of contents
  • dictionaries
  • bibliography
  • surveys of literature
NLM call number
WW 600
http://library.link/vocab/relatedWorkOrContributorName
  • Dana, Tracy
  • Bougatsos, Christina
  • United States
  • Oregon Health & Science University
Series statement
  • Evidence synthesis
  • AHRQ publication
Series volume
  • no. 81
  • no. 11-05151-EF-1
http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
  • Vision Disorders
  • Mass Screening
  • Mass Screening
  • Primary Health Care
  • Child, Preschool
  • Infant
  • Review
Label
Screening for visual impairment in children ages 1-5 years : systematic review to update the 2004 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation, prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; prepared by: Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University ; investigators: Roger Chou, Tracy Dana, Christina Bougatsos, (electronic resource)
Instantiates
Publication
Note
  • Title from PDF t.p. (viewed on July 19, 2011)
  • "February 2011."
Bibliography note
Includes bibliographical references
Dimensions
unknown
Extent
1 online resource.
Form of item
online
Specific material designation
remote
System control number
  • 1563589
  • (DNLM)BKSHLF:NBK52708
Label
Screening for visual impairment in children ages 1-5 years : systematic review to update the 2004 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation, prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; prepared by: Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health & Science University ; investigators: Roger Chou, Tracy Dana, Christina Bougatsos, (electronic resource)
Publication
Note
  • Title from PDF t.p. (viewed on July 19, 2011)
  • "February 2011."
Bibliography note
Includes bibliographical references
Dimensions
unknown
Extent
1 online resource.
Form of item
online
Specific material designation
remote
System control number
  • 1563589
  • (DNLM)BKSHLF:NBK52708

Library Locations

  • African Studies LibraryBorrow it
    771 Commonwealth Avenue, 6th Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.350723 -71.108227
  • Alumni Medical LibraryBorrow it
    72 East Concord Street, Boston, MA, 02118, US
    42.336388 -71.072393
  • Astronomy LibraryBorrow it
    725 Commonwealth Avenue, 6th Floor, Boston, MA, 02445, US
    42.350259 -71.105717
  • Fineman and Pappas Law LibrariesBorrow it
    765 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.350979 -71.107023
  • Frederick S. Pardee Management LibraryBorrow it
    595 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.349626 -71.099547
  • Howard Gotlieb Archival Research CenterBorrow it
    771 Commonwealth Avenue, 5th Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.350723 -71.108227
  • Mugar Memorial LibraryBorrow it
    771 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.350723 -71.108227
  • Music LibraryBorrow it
    771 Commonwealth Avenue, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.350723 -71.108227
  • Pikering Educational Resources LibraryBorrow it
    2 Silber Way, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.349804 -71.101425
  • School of Theology LibraryBorrow it
    745 Commonwealth Avenue, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.350494 -71.107235
  • Science & Engineering LibraryBorrow it
    38 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, US
    42.348472 -71.102257
  • Stone Science LibraryBorrow it
    675 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02445, US
    42.350103 -71.103784
Processing Feedback ...