Cost effectiveness
Resource Information
The topic Cost effectiveness represents a specific aggregation or gathering of resources found in Boston University Libraries.
The Resource
Cost effectiveness
Resource Information
The topic Cost effectiveness represents a specific aggregation or gathering of resources found in Boston University Libraries.
- Label
- Cost effectiveness
A sample of Items that are about the Topic Cost effectiveness See All
Context
Context of Cost effectivenessFocus of
No resources found
No enriched resources found
- Cost effectiveness -- Methodology
- Cost effectiveness -- Methodology -- Congresses
- Cost effectiveness -- Periodicals
- Cost effectiveness -- Philosophy
- Cost effectiveness -- Philosophy
- Cost effectiveness -- Political aspects -- United States
- Cost effectiveness -- Social aspects
- Cost effectiveness -- Study and teaching
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness
- Cost effectiveness -- Abstracts
- Cost effectiveness -- Bibliography
- Cost effectiveness -- Case studies
- Cost effectiveness -- Case studies
- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Cost effectiveness -- Ethiopia
- Cost effectiveness -- Evaluation
- Cost effectiveness -- Government policy
- Cost effectiveness -- Government policy -- United States
- Cost effectiveness -- Mathematical models
- Cost effectiveness -- Mathematical models
- Cost effectiveness -- Mathematical models
Subfocus of
No resources found
No enriched resources found
- Air quality management -- Cost effectiveness
- Air quality management -- Cost effectiveness
- Air quality management -- Cost effectiveness
- Air quality management -- Cost effectiveness
- Air quality management -- Cost effectiveness
- Air quality management -- Cost effectiveness
- Air quality management -- Government policy -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Air quality management -- Government policy | Cost effectiveness
- Air quality management -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Air-to-surface missiles -- Cost effectiveness
- Aircraft carriers -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Airplanes -- Air refueling | Cost effectiveness
- Airplanes -- Air refueling | Cost effectiveness
- Airplanes -- Air refueling | Cost effectiveness
- Airplanes, Military -- Cost effectiveness
- Airports -- Safety measures | Cost effectiveness
- Alcoholics -- Hospital care | Cost effectiveness
- Alcoholism -- Treatment -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Alcoholism -- Treatment | Cost effectiveness
- Alcoholism -- Treatment | Cost effectiveness
- Alternatives to imprisonment -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Ambulatory medical care -- Cost effectiveness
- Architecture -- Cost effectiveness
- Architecture -- Cost effectiveness
- Automobiles -- Fuel consumption | Law and legislation -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Automobiles -- Motors | Exhaust gas | Cost effectiveness
- Automobiles -- Motors | Exhaust gas | Cost effectiveness
- Automobiles -- Motors | Exhaust gas | Law and legislation | Cost effectiveness
- Automobiles -- Safety regulations -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Ballistic missile defenses -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Bank management -- Cost effectiveness
- Bank management -- Cost effectiveness -- Periodicals
- Bank management -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Bank mergers -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Banking law -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Banks and banking -- Cost effectiveness
- Banks and banking -- Europe -- Cost effectiveness
- Biogas -- Developing countries -- Cost effectiveness
- Birth control -- Cost effectiveness
- Birth control -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Birth control -- Cost effectiveness | Case studies -- Congresses
- Birth control -- Egypt -- Cost effectiveness
- Border security -- Government policy -- United States -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Bounties, Military -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Breast -- Cancer | Diagnosis | Cost effectiveness
- Breast -- Cancer | Diagnosis | Cost effectiveness
- Breast -- Cancer | Treatment | Cost effectiveness
- Breast -- Radiography | Cost effectiveness
- Breeder reactors -- Cost effectiveness
- Building -- Cost effectiveness
- Building -- Estimates | Cost effectiveness
- Building -- Estimates | Cost effectiveness
- Building leases -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Buses -- Maintenance and repair | Cost effectiveness
- Buses -- Maintenance and repair | Cost effectiveness
- Business logistics -- Cost effectiveness
- Business logistics -- Cost effectiveness
- Business logistics -- Cost effectiveness
- Business logistics -- Cost effectiveness
- Cataract -- Surgery | Cost effectiveness
- Cement industries -- Capital investments -- Estonia | Kunda -- Cost effectiveness -- Case studies
- Cement industries -- Waste disposal -- Estonia | Kunda -- Cost effectiveness -- Case studies
- Census -- Cost effectiveness
- Cerebrovascular disease -- Treatment | Cost effectiveness
- Cervix uteri -- Cancer | Diagnosis | Cost effectiveness
- Charities -- Cost effectiveness
- Child health services -- Developing countries -- Cost effectiveness | Mathematical models
- Child mental health services -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Child welfare -- Cost effectiveness
- Child welfare -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Civil service -- Furloughs | Cost effectiveness
- Civil service -- United States -- Personnel management | Cost effectiveness
- Climate change mitigation -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Climatic changes -- Cost effectiveness
- Climatic changes -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Coal mines and mining -- Environmental aspects | Cost effectiveness
- Cocaine abuse -- United States -- Prevention | Cost effectiveness
- Cocaine industry -- Government policy -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Collecting of accounts -- Cost effectiveness
- Colon (Anatomy) -- Cancer | Diagnosis | Cost effectiveness
- Colon (Anatomy) -- Cancer | Diagnosis | Cost effectiveness
- Colon (Anatomy) -- Cancer | Diagnosis | Cost effectiveness
- Combined operations (Military science) -- Cost effectiveness
- Community health services -- Cost effectiveness
- Community health services -- Great Britain -- Cost effectiveness
- Community health services -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Community mental health services -- Cost effectiveness
- Community mental health services -- Cost effectiveness
- Community mental health services -- Cost effectiveness
- Community mental health services -- Cost effectiveness
- Community-based corrections -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Compromise (Law) -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Computer-assisted instruction -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Consumer protection -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Continuing education -- Cost effectiveness
- Contracting out -- Cost effectiveness
- Contracting out -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Corn -- Research -- Zimbabwe -- Cost effectiveness
- Corrections -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Crime prevention -- Cost effectiveness
- Crime prevention -- Cost effectiveness
- Crime prevention -- Cost effectiveness
- Crime prevention -- Cost effectiveness
- Crime prevention -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Criminal justice, Administration of -- Cost effectiveness
- Criminal justice, Administration of -- Cost effectiveness
- Criminal justice, Administration of -- Cost effectiveness
- Criminal justice, Administration of -- Cost effectiveness
- Criminal justice, Administration of -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Criminals -- Drug use | Treatment | Cost effectiveness
- Cycling -- Cost effectiveness
- Decentralization in government -- Cost effectiveness | Mathematical models
- Defense contracts -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Defense industries -- Cost effectiveness
- Deferred giving -- Cost effectiveness
- Deferred giving -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Delegated legislation -- Cost effectiveness
- Delegated legislation -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Depressed persons -- Medical care -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Depression, Mental -- Treatment -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Destroyers (Warships) -- United States -- Maintenance and repair | Cost effectiveness
- Developing countries -- Economic policy | Cost effectiveness
- Developing countries -- Investments, foreign | Cost effectiveness
- Disaster relief -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Dispute resolution (Law) -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Domestic international sales corporations -- Cost effectiveness
- Double shifts (Public schools) -- Cost effectiveness
- Downsizing of organizations -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Drinking water -- Standards -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Drone aircraft -- Cost effectiveness
- Drug abuse -- Prevention | Cost effectiveness
- Drug abuse -- Study and teaching -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Drug abuse -- Treatment -- Maine -- Cost effectiveness
- Drug abuse -- Treatment | Cost effectiveness
- Drug control -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Drug courts -- Oregon | Multnomah County -- Cost effectiveness
- Drug courts -- Oregon | Multnomah County -- Cost effectiveness
- Drug courts -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Drug utilization -- Cost effectiveness -- Periodicals
- Drugs -- Cost effectiveness
- Drugs -- Cost effectiveness
- Drugs -- Cost effectiveness
- Drugs -- Cost effectiveness
- Drugs -- Cost effectiveness
- Drugs -- Cost effectiveness
- Drugs -- Prescribing -- Great Britain -- Cost effectiveness
- Drugs -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Early childhood education -- California -- Cost effectiveness
- Early childhood education -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Economic development -- Environmental aspects | Cost effectiveness
- Economic development -- Environmental aspects | Cost effectiveness
- Economic development -- Environmental aspects | Cost effectiveness
- Economic development -- Environmental aspects | Cost effectiveness
- Economic development projects -- Africa -- Cost effectiveness
- Economic development projects -- Cost effectiveness
- Economic development projects -- Cost effectiveness
- Economic development projects -- Cost effectiveness
- Economic development projects -- Cost effectiveness
- Economic development projects -- Cost effectiveness -- Case studies
- Economic development projects -- Cost effectiveness -- Handbooks, manuals, etc
- Economic development projects -- Developing countries -- Cost effectiveness
- Economic development projects -- Senegal | Nianga region -- Cost effectiveness
- Economic policy -- Cost effectiveness
- Ecosystem services -- Cost effectiveness
- Education -- Cost effectiveness
- Education -- Developing countries -- Cost effectiveness
- Education -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Educational planning -- Cost effectiveness
- Educational planning -- Cost effectiveness
- Educational planning -- Cost effectiveness
- Educational technology -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Electric power production -- Cost effectiveness
- Electric power production -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Electric utilities -- Cost effectiveness
- Electric utilities -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Electric vehicles -- Cost effectiveness
- Electric vehicles -- Cost effectiveness
- Electronic filing of tax returns -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Embassy buildings -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Emergency management -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Employees -- Training of | Cost effectiveness
- Employees -- Training of | Cost effectiveness
- Employees -- Training of | Cost effectiveness
- Energy conservation -- Cost effectiveness
- Energy conservation -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Energy consumption -- Technological innovations -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Energy consumption -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Energy development -- Cost effectiveness
- Energy development -- Cost effectiveness
- Energy development -- Cost effectiveness
- Energy development -- Cost effectiveness
- Energy development -- Cost effectiveness
- Energy development -- Government policy -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Energy development -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Energy industries -- United States -- Data processing | Cost effectiveness
- Energy policy -- United States -- Data processing | Cost effectiveness
- Enterprise resource planning -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental health -- Government policy | Cost effectiveness
- Environmental impact analysis -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental impact analysis -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental impact analysis -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental impact analysis -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental law -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental law -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental monitoring -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental monitoring -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental monitoring -- United States -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Environmental policy -- Australia -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental policy -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental policy -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental policy -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental policy -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental policy -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental policy -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental policy -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental policy -- Cost effectiveness -- Bibliography
- Environmental policy -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Environmental policy -- Estonia -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental policy -- European Economic Community countries -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental policy -- Japan -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental policy -- Ohio -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental policy -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental protection -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental protection -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental protection -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental protection -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental protection -- Oklahoma -- Cost effectiveness
- Environmental protection -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Executive departments -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Expenditures, Public -- Cost effectiveness
- Expenditures, Public -- Cost effectiveness
- Expenditures, Public -- Cost effectiveness
- Expenditures, Public -- Cost effectiveness
- Expenditures, Public -- Cost effectiveness -- Case studies
- F-35 (Military aircraft) -- Cost effectiveness | Evaluation
- Family planning -- Cost effectiveness
- Family services -- United States -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Farms, Small -- Research -- Zimbabwe -- Cost effectiveness
- Federal Reserve banks -- Cost effectiveness
- Federal aid to child welfare -- Cost effectiveness
- Federal aid to child welfare -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Federal aid to transportation -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Federal aid to water quality management -- Cost effectiveness
- Federal aid to water quality management -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Federal aid to water resources development -- Cost effectiveness
- Federal aid to water resources development -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Firearms -- Law and legislation -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Firearms -- Law and legislation | Cost effectiveness
- Food industry and trade -- Developing countries -- Cost effectiveness
- Food relief -- Government policy -- India -- Cost effectiveness
- Food relief, American -- Developing countries -- Cost effectiveness
- Food supply -- Government policy -- India -- Cost effectiveness
- Foreign licensing agreements -- Cost effectiveness
- Foreign licensing agreements -- Cost effectiveness
- Fuel -- Transportation -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Fuel cells -- Cost effectiveness
- Government aircraft -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Government aircraft -- United States -- Maintenance and repair | Cost effectiveness
- Government business enterprises -- Cost effectiveness
- Government business enterprises -- Cost effectiveness
- Government business enterprises -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Government ownership -- Cost effectiveness
- Government ownership -- Cost effectiveness
- Government paperwork -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Government productivity -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Government property -- Security measures -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Government purchasing -- Cost effectiveness
- Government purchasing -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Government spending policy -- Cost effectiveness
- Government spending policy -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Great Britain -- Economic policy -- 1964-1979 -- Cost effectiveness
- Great Britain -- Social policy -- 1979- -- Cost effectiveness
- Green products -- Cost effectiveness
- Greenhouse gas mitigation -- Cost effectiveness
- Greenhouse gas mitigation -- OECD countries -- Cost effectiveness
- Group psychotherapy -- Cost effectiveness
- HIV infections -- Prevention | Cost effectiveness
- Halfway houses -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Health services administration -- Cost effectiveness
- Heating -- Equipment and supplies | Cost effectiveness
- Heating -- Finland -- Equipment and supplies | Cost effectiveness
- High school dropouts -- Services for -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Home care services -- Cost effectiveness
- Home care services -- Cost effectiveness
- Home care services -- Cost effectiveness
- Home care services -- Cost effectiveness
- Home care services -- Cost effectiveness
- Home care services -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Home detention -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Horticulture -- Cost effectiveness
- Hospital buildings -- Disinfection | Cost effectiveness
- Hospital care -- Canada -- Cost effectiveness
- Hospital care -- Cost effectiveness
- Hospital care -- Cost effectiveness
- Hospital care -- Cost effectiveness
- Hospital care -- Cost effectiveness
- Hospital care -- Cost effectiveness
- Hospital care -- Cost effectiveness
- Hospital care -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Hospital care -- United States -- Cost effectiveness | Econometric models
- Hospitals -- Emergency services | Cost effectiveness
- Hospitals -- Prospective payment -- United States -- Cost effectiveness | Evaluation
- Household appliances -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Housing subsidies -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Human capital -- Cost effectiveness
- Humanities -- Research -- Great Britain -- Cost effectiveness
- Immigrants -- Services for | Cost effectiveness
- Immunization -- Burkina Faso -- Cost effectiveness -- Case studies
- Immunization -- Cost effectiveness
- Independent regulatory commissions -- Cost effectiveness
- Independent regulatory commissions -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Industrial hygiene -- Law and legislation -- United States -- Cost effectiveness | Congresses
- Industrial hygiene -- Law and legislation | Cost effectiveness
- Industrial hygiene -- Standards -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Industrial management -- Environmental aspects | Cost effectiveness
- Industrial management -- Environmental aspects | Cost effectiveness
- Industrial policy -- Cost effectiveness
- Industrial policy -- Germany (West) -- Cost effectiveness
- Industrial policy -- Great Britain -- Cost effectiveness
- Industrial policy -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Industrial procurement -- Cost effectiveness
- Industrial safety -- Law and legislation -- United States -- Cost effectiveness | Congresses
- Industrial safety -- Law and legislation | Cost effectiveness
- Industrial safety -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Influenza vaccines -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Information resources management -- Cost effectiveness
- Information resources management -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Information storage and retrieval systems -- Court administration -- United States -- States | Cost effectiveness
- Information storage and retrieval systems -- Criminal justice, Administration of -- United States -- States | Cost effectiveness
- Information storage and retrieval systems -- Medical care | Cost effectiveness
- Information storage and retrieval systems -- Medical care | Cost effectiveness
- Information storage and retrieval systems -- Medicine | Cost effectiveness
- Information technology -- Cost effectiveness
- Information technology -- Cost effectiveness
- Information technology -- Cost effectiveness | Evaluation
- Information technology -- Cost effectiveness | Mathematical models
- Integrated logistic support -- Cost effectiveness
- Intelligence service -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Interlibrary loans -- New York (State) -- Cost effectiveness
- International trade -- Cost effectiveness
- Intervention (Criminal procedure) -- California -- Cost effectiveness
- Investments, Foreign -- Cost effectiveness
- Investments, Foreign -- Developing countries -- Cost effectiveness
- Irrigation -- Cost effectiveness
- Irrigation -- India | Ahmadnagar (District) -- Cost effectiveness
- Labor disputes -- Cost effectiveness
- Labor disputes -- Cost effectiveness
- Law -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Law -- United States -- Decision making | Cost effectiveness
- Law enforcement -- United States -- Planning | Cost effectiveness
- Layoff systems -- Cost effectiveness
- Layoff systems -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Libraries -- Communication systems | Cost effectiveness
- Life expectancy -- Cost effectiveness
- Life expectancy -- Cost effectiveness
- Life insurance -- Cost effectiveness
- Life insurance -- Cost effectiveness
- Local government -- Cost effectiveness
- Local transit -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Logistics -- Cost effectiveness
- Logistics -- Cost effectiveness
- Logistics -- Cost effectiveness
- Logistics -- Cost effectiveness
- Machine learning -- Cost effectiveness
- Management information systems -- Cost effectiveness
- Management information systems -- Cost effectiveness
- Management information systems -- Cost effectiveness
- Management information systems -- Cost effectiveness
- Management information systems -- Cost effectiveness
- Manpower planning -- Cost effectiveness
- Manpower planning -- Cost effectiveness
- Manpower planning -- Cost effectiveness
- Manpower planning -- Cost effectiveness
- Manpower policy -- Cost effectiveness
- Manpower policy -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Manpower policy -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Marketing -- Cost effectiveness
- Maternal health services -- Developing countries | Cost effectiveness
- Meat hygiene -- Standards -- Great Britain -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- Congresses | Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness -- Great Britain
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness -- Handbooks, manuals, etc
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness | Congresses
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness | Congresses
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness | Econometric models
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness | Econometric models
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness | Econometric models
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness | Econometric models
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness | Econometric models -- Congresses
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness | Handbooks, manuals, etc
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness | Mathematical models
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness | Research | Methodology
- Medical care -- Cost effectiveness | Research | Methodology
- Medical care -- Developing countries -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- European Union countries -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- India -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- India -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- OECD countries -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- Technological innovations -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- Technological innovations -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical care -- United States -- Cost effectiveness -- Case studies
- Medical care -- Vermont -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical innovations -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical innovations -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical policy -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical records -- Data processing | Cost effectiveness
- Medical screening -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical screening -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical technology -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical technology -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical technology -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical technology -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical technology -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical technology -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical technology -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical technology -- Great Britain -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical technology -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical technology -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Medical technology -- United States -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Medical technology -- United States -- Cost effectiveness | Evaluation
- Medicare -- Cost effectiveness
- Medicare -- Cost effectiveness
- Medicare -- Cost effectiveness
- Medicare -- Cost effectiveness
- Medicare -- Cost effectiveness
- Medicare -- Cost effectiveness | Research
- Medicare -- Wisconsin -- Cost effectiveness
- Medicine -- Information technology -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Medicine -- Research -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Medicine -- Research -- United States -- Cost effectiveness -- Case studies
- Medicine -- Research | Cost effectiveness
- Medicine -- Research | Cost effectiveness
- Medicine -- Research | Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Medicine -- Study and teaching (Continuing education) | Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Medicine, Preventive -- Cost effectiveness
- Medicine, Preventive -- Cost effectiveness
- Medicine, Preventive -- Cost effectiveness | Evaluation
- Medicine, Preventive -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Mental health services -- Cost effectiveness
- Mental health services -- Cost effectiveness
- Mental health services -- Cost effectiveness
- Mental health services -- Cost effectiveness
- Metal products -- Cost effectiveness -- Congress65es
- Metallic composites -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Meteorological satellites -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Meteorological stations -- Automation | Cost effectiveness
- Military base closures -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Military base closures -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Military bases, American -- Cost effectiveness
- Military education -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Military exchanges -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Mining engineering -- Cost effectiveness
- Missile attack warning systems -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Municipal services -- Cost effectiveness
- Municipal services -- Cost effectiveness
- National security -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Navy-yards and naval stations -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Nosocomial infections -- Prevention | Cost effectiveness
- Nuclear facilities -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Nuclear warships -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Nuclear weapons -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Nursing -- Cost effectiveness
- Nursing -- Cost effectiveness
- Nursing -- Cost effectiveness
- Nursing -- Cost effectiveness
- Obesity -- Treatment | Cost effectiveness
- Occupational retraining -- Cost effectiveness
- Occupational retraining -- Michigan -- Cost effectiveness
- Occupational retraining -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Occupational training -- Cost effectiveness
- Occupational training -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Office layout -- Cost effectiveness
- Older people -- Hospital care | Cost effectiveness
- Older people -- Medical care -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Older people -- Medical care | Cost effectiveness
- Older people -- Nursing home care | Cost effectiveness
- Ozone -- Environmental aspects -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- People with social disabilities -- Services for -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Personnel management -- Cost effectiveness
- Petroleum reserves -- Cost effectiveness
- Photovoltaic power generation -- Cost effectiveness
- Photovoltaic power generation -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Physicians' assistants -- Cost effectiveness
- Physicians' assistants -- Cost effectiveness
- Physicians' assistants -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Police -- Cost effectiveness
- Police -- Cost effectiveness
- Policy sciences -- Cost effectiveness
- Policy sciences -- Cost effectiveness
- Policy sciences -- Cost effectiveness
- Policy sciences -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Policy sciences -- Cost effectiveness | Congresses
- Political planning -- Cost effectiveness
- Pollution -- Economic aspects -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Pollution -- Economic aspects | Cost effectiveness
- Population -- Cost effectiveness
- Population policy -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Precision guided munitions -- Purchasing -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Preventive health services for children -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Primary health care -- Korea -- Cost effectiveness
- Prisoners -- Education | Cost effectiveness
- Privatization -- Cost effectiveness
- Privatization -- Cost effectiveness
- Privatization -- Cost effectiveness
- Privatization -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Probation -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Problem youth -- Services for -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Product safety -- Cost effectiveness
- Product safety -- Standards -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Production control -- Cost effectiveness
- Professional standards review organizations (Medicine) -- Cost effectiveness
- Professional standards review organizations (Medicine) -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Project management -- Cost effectiveness
- Prostate -- Cancer | Diagnosis -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Psychotherapy -- Cost effectiveness | Research
- Public administration -- Cost effectiveness
- Public administration -- Cost effectiveness
- Public administration -- Cost effectiveness
- Public administration -- Cost effectiveness
- Public administration -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Public administration -- Cost effectiveness | Congresses
- Public contracts -- Cost effectiveness
- Public contracts -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Public goods -- Cost effectiveness
- Public goods -- Cost effectiveness
- Public goods -- Cost effectiveness
- Public goods -- Cost effectiveness
- Public health -- Africa, West -- Cost effectiveness
- Public health -- Cost effectiveness
- Public health -- Cost effectiveness
- Public health -- United States -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Public health laws -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Public investments -- Cost effectiveness
- Public libraries -- Cost effectiveness -- Handbooks, manuals, etc
- Public libraries -- United States -- Cost effectiveness -- Handbooks, manuals, etc
- Public schools -- Cost effectiveness
- Public schools -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Public schools -- United States -- Data processing | Cost effectiveness
- Public service employment -- Cost effectiveness
- Public service employment -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Public works -- Cost effectiveness
- Radiation warning systems -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Rectum -- Cancer | Diagnosis | Cost effectiveness
- Rectum -- Cancer | Diagnosis | Cost effectiveness
- Rectum -- Cancer | Diagnosis | Cost effectiveness
- Rent control -- Cost effectiveness
- Rent control -- Cost effectiveness
- Rent control -- Ghana | Kumasi -- Cost effectiveness
- Research -- Cost effectiveness
- Research -- Cost effectiveness
- Research, Industrial -- Cost effectiveness
- Research, Industrial -- Cost effectiveness
- Research, Industrial -- Cost effectiveness
- Revenue sharing -- Cost effectiveness
- Revenue sharing -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Rice -- Processing -- Bangladesh -- Cost effectiveness
- Rice -- Processing | Cost effectiveness
- Roads -- Cost effectiveness
- Roads -- Soviet Union -- Cost effectiveness
- Roads -- United States -- Design and construction | Cost effectiveness
- Safety regulations -- Cost effectiveness
- Safety regulations -- Cost effectiveness
- Safety regulations -- Cost effectiveness
- Safety regulations -- Cost effectiveness
- Safety regulations -- Great Britain -- Cost effectiveness
- Safety regulations -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Saline water conversion -- Cost effectiveness
- Saline water conversion -- Israel -- Cost effectiveness
- Schedules, School -- Cost effectiveness
- School improvement programs -- Cost effectiveness
- Securities industry -- State supervision -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Security classification (Government documents) -- Cost effectiveness
- Security classification (Government documents) -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Semiconductor production equipment industry -- Cost effectiveness
- Sewage disposal plants -- Cost effectiveness
- Sewage disposal plants -- Cost effectiveness
- Sheltered workshops -- Massachusetts -- Cost effectiveness
- Shopping centers -- Cost effectiveness
- Shopping centers -- Cost effectiveness -- Case studies
- Skin -- Cancer | Diagnosis | Cost effectiveness
- Small business -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Social policy -- Cost effectiveness
- Social policy -- Cost effectiveness
- Social policy -- Cost effectiveness
- Social sciences -- Research | Cost effectiveness
- Social sciences -- Research | Cost effectiveness
- Social service -- Cost effectiveness
- Social service -- Cost effectiveness
- Social service -- Cost effectiveness
- Social service -- Cost effectiveness
- Soil conservation projects -- Africa, Southern -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Soil conservation projects -- Cost effectiveness
- Soil conservation projects -- Cost effectiveness
- Soil conservation projects -- Cost effectiveness
- Soil conservation projects -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Solar energy -- United States -- Passive systems | Cost effectiveness
- Starting Early Starting Smart (Program) -- Cost effectiveness
- State governments -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Strategic Defense Initiative -- Cost effectiveness
- Strategic Defense Initiative -- Cost effectiveness
- Strategic Defense Initiative -- Cost effectiveness
- Strategic forces -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Strategic planning -- Environmental aspects | Cost effectiveness
- Stream measurements -- Cost effectiveness
- Stream measurements -- Maine -- Cost effectiveness
- Students -- Drug use -- United States -- Prevention | Cost effectiveness
- Substance abuse -- Treatment -- Great Britain -- Cost effectiveness
- Substance abuse -- Treatment -- Idaho -- Cost effectiveness
- Substance abuse -- Treatment -- Maine -- Cost effectiveness
- Substance abuse -- Treatment | Cost effectiveness
- Substance abuse -- Treatment | Cost effectiveness
- Superplastic forming (Metal-work) -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Surgery -- Cost effectiveness
- Surgery -- Cost effectiveness
- Sustainable development -- Cost effectiveness
- Tax administration and procedure -- Data processing | Cost effectiveness
- Team nursing -- Cost effectiveness
- Team nursing -- Cost effectiveness
- Technological innovations -- Cost effectiveness
- Technology transfer -- Cost effectiveness
- Technology transfer -- Cost effectiveness
- Telecommunication -- Cost effectiveness
- Telecommunication -- Cost effectiveness
- Telecommunication -- Cost effectiveness
- Telecommunication -- Cost effectiveness
- Terrorism -- Prevention | Government policy -- United States -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Terrorism -- United States -- Prevention | Cost effectiveness
- Titanium alloys -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Trade regulation -- Cost effectiveness
- Trade regulation -- Cost effectiveness
- Trade regulation -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Trade regulation -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Traffic safety -- Cost effectiveness
- Traffic safety -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Traffic safety -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Traffic safety -- United States -- Finance | Cost effectiveness
- Transportation -- Cost effectiveness
- Transportation -- Cost effectiveness
- Transportation -- Cost effectiveness
- Transportation -- Cost effectiveness
- Transportation -- Cost effectiveness -- Case studies
- Transportation -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- United States -- Armed Forces | Civilian employees | Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Armed Forces | Civilian employees | Personnel management | Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Armed Forces | Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Armed Forces | Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Armed Forces | Equipment | Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Armed Forces | Medical care | Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Armed Forces | Medical care | Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Armed Forces | Mobilization | Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Armed Forces | Procurement | Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Armed Forces | Weapons systems | Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Armed Forces | Weapons systems | Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Census, 1990 -- Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Census, 2020 | Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Census, 2020 | Cost effectiveness | Evaluation
- United States -- Officials and employees | Dismissal of | Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Officials and employees | Dismissal of | Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Officials and employees | Leaves and furloughs | Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Population | Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Social policy -- 1993- -- Cost effectiveness
- United States -- Social policy | Cost effectiveness
- United States, Air Force Materiel Command -- Reorganization | Cost effectiveness
- United States, Department of Defense -- Personnel management | Cost effectiveness
- United States, Department of Defense -- Procurement | Cost effectiveness
- United States, Dept. of Defense -- Procurement | Cost effectiveness
- United States, Dept. of Homeland Security -- Information technology | Cost effectiveness
- United States, Marine Corps -- Reorganization | Cost effectiveness
- Urban runoff -- Management | Cost effectiveness
- Vaccination -- Burkina Faso -- Cost effectiveness
- Vaccination -- Burkina Faso -- Cost effectiveness -- Case studies
- Vaccination -- Cost effectiveness
- Vaccination -- Cost effectiveness
- Vaccination -- Developing countries -- Cost effectiveness
- Veterans -- Education -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Veterans -- Medical care -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Veterans' hospitals -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Vocational rehabilitation -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Warships -- United States -- Maintenance and repair | Cost effectiveness
- Water -- Purification | Chromium removal | Cost effectiveness
- Water -- Purification | Sand filtration | Cost effectiveness
- Water conservation projects -- Africa, Southern -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Water conservation projects -- Cost effectiveness
- Water conservation projects -- Cost effectiveness
- Water conservation projects -- Cost effectiveness
- Water conservation projects -- Cost effectiveness -- Congresses
- Water quality management -- Cost effectiveness
- Water quality management -- Cost effectiveness
- Water quality management -- Cost effectiveness
- Water quality management -- Cost effectiveness
- Water quality management -- Cost effectiveness
- Water quality management -- Cost effectiveness | Congresses
- Water quality management -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Water resources development -- Cost effectiveness
- Water resources development -- Cost effectiveness
- Water resources development -- Thailand -- Cost effectiveness
- Water resources development -- Tunisia -- Cost effectiveness
- Water resources development -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Welfare fraud investigation -- Cost effectiveness
- Welfare fraud investigation -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Wells -- Cost effectiveness
- Wells -- Cost effectiveness
- Wireless communication systems -- Cost effectiveness
- AIDS (Disease) -- Patients | Home care | Cost effectiveness
- Youth -- Drug use -- United States -- Prevention | Cost effectiveness
- AIDS (Disease) -- Patients | Services for | Cost effectiveness
- AIDS (Disease) -- Prevention | Cost effectiveness
- Academic achievement -- Cost effectiveness
- Acquisition of scientific publications -- New York (State) -- Cost effectiveness
- Acquisition of serial publications -- New York (State) -- Cost effectiveness
- Acquisition of serial publications -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Administrative acts -- Cost effectiveness
- Administrative acts -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Administrative agencies -- Cost effectiveness
- Administrative agencies -- Officials and employees | Training of | Cost effectiveness
- Administrative agencies -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Administrative agencies -- United States -- Management | Cost effectiveness
- Administrative agencies -- United States -- Rules and practice -- Cost effectiveness
- Administrative law -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Administrative procedure -- Cost effectiveness
- Administrative procedure -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Administrative regulation drafting -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Advertising layout and typography -- Cost effectiveness
- Advertising media planning -- Cost effectiveness
- Aerospace industries -- Cost effectiveness
- Agricultural assistance -- Cost effectiveness
- Agricultural assistance -- Cost effectiveness
- Agricultural assistance -- Cost effectiveness
- Agricultural assistance -- Cost effectiveness
- Agricultural development projects -- Cost effectiveness
- Agricultural development projects -- Developing countries -- Cost effectiveness
- Agricultural development projects -- Sudan -- Cost effectiveness -- Case studies
- Agricultural extension work -- Zimbabwe -- Cost effectiveness
- Agriculture -- Economic aspects | Research -- Tanzania -- Cost effectiveness | Data processing
- Agriculture -- Economic aspects | Research -- Zambia -- Cost effectiveness | Data processing
- Agriculture -- Economic aspects | Research -- Zimbabwe -- Cost effectiveness | Data processing
- Agriculture and state -- Africa -- Cost effectiveness -- Case studies
- Agriculture and state -- Cost effectiveness
- Air -- Pollution -- Law and legislation -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Air -- Pollution -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Air -- Pollution | Cost effectiveness
- Air -- Pollution | Government policy -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Air defenses -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Air filters -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Air quality -- Standards | Law and legislation -- United States -- Cost effectiveness
- Air quality management -- Cost effectiveness
Embed
Settings
Select options that apply then copy and paste the RDF/HTML data fragment to include in your application
Embed this data in a secure (HTTPS) page:
Layout options:
Include data citation:
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.bu.edu/resource/rv3BaUyjP28/" typeof="CategoryCode http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Topic"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.bu.edu/resource/rv3BaUyjP28/">Cost effectiveness</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.bu.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.bu.edu/">Boston University Libraries</a></span></span></span></span></div>
Note: Adjust the width and height settings defined in the RDF/HTML code fragment to best match your requirements
Preview
Cite Data - Experimental
Data Citation of the Topic Cost effectiveness
Copy and paste the following RDF/HTML data fragment to cite this resource
<div class="citation" vocab="http://schema.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link-square fa-fw"></i> Data from <span resource="http://link.bu.edu/resource/rv3BaUyjP28/" typeof="CategoryCode http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/Topic"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a href="http://link.bu.edu/resource/rv3BaUyjP28/">Cost effectiveness</a></span> - <span property="potentialAction" typeOf="OrganizeAction"><span property="agent" typeof="LibrarySystem http://library.link/vocab/LibrarySystem" resource="http://link.bu.edu/"><span property="name http://bibfra.me/vocab/lite/label"><a property="url" href="http://link.bu.edu/">Boston University Libraries</a></span></span></span></span></div>
